Wisdom Literature

Name:
Location: Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

Possible Exam Questions

Possible Exam Questions (Song of Songs)
Question 1
How does the worldview of Song of Songs compare with that of Ecclesiastes? To what extent and on what points are they in agreement or conflict?
Question 2
What are some of the ways people have tried to account for the sexual imagery in Song of Songs? Which explanation do you prefer and why?
Question 3
What is the view of human sexuality presented in the Song? What kinds of relationships are affirmed and what kinds are opposed?
Question 4
Describe some examples from history in which culture and philosophy have influenced the interpretation of the Song of Songs. What lessons can we learn from this history to ensure that our interpretation of the Song is honest, not pre-determined by the presuppositions we were raised with?
Question 5
What can we know about who wrote the Song of Songs? Do you think it was written about, for, or by Solomon? Was its composer a man or a woman, or is this irrelevant? Was it written during Solomon's reign, or if not, when? As always, explain why you think so.
Question 6
Describe the characters in the Song of Songs? Besides the two lovers, are there any others? Who? Which of them have speaking roles, and to what extent? Do you think the girl's lover is Solomon or someone else? Why?

Week 11 lecture notes (unformatted)

Week 11
8:30 Quiz
8:45 Paper Due
8:50 Men in the Song: One or two? Positive or Negative?
Is the lover the same as the king (Solomon)? Why or why not? Which passages support your view? Which are problematic?
9:05 Possible Exam Questions
9:10 Outline of Song of Songs
A tale of fidelity to love in the face of power and coercion.
1–2: The woman, a member of the king's harem, expresses love for her lover, not for the king. The man reciprocates.
3: The woman is determined to overcome threats to her relationship with the man.
4–5: the threats are again resisted, and the depth of the relationship seems very committed.
6–7: more graphic descriptions of the relationship
8: declaration of woman's passion and resistance to other males who claim possession of her (brothers, the king).
· The woman is a more prominent character than the man; she speaks more and takes more initiative.
· She is devoted to a faithful, monogamous, intimate relationship, and refuses to be a pawn in a male game of legal contracts, money, and objectification.
· She struggles for fidelity to her lover when confronted with the king.
9:20 Passage identification in the Song of Songs
Passage
Typical Content
1:1 Title
The Song of Songs which is to Solomon
1:2–6 Introduction
Who is the girl, Solomon, the harem girls, and the guy.
1:7–8 The search for the shepherd

1:12–17 The campout

2 I and my love
I am my lover's and he is mine (also ch. 6);
he is a stag leaping the mountains
3:1–5 Dream sequence 1
The watchmen let her go; she finds him
3:6–11 The opulent scene
who is this coming up from the desert?
Solomon's bed, "carriage", crowned on his wedding.
4:1–15 You are beautiful
Your teeth are sheep (also ch. 6)
A garden locked up
5:2–8 Dream sequence 2
The watchmen beat her
5:9–16: He is handsome
His arms are rods of gold
6
I am my lovers, and he is mine (also 2, 7);
Your teeth are sheep (also 4);
She is unique
7:1 The Shullamite

7:2–10: You are beautiful

7:11–14: Let's get out!
There I will give you my love
8:1–4 If he were my brother
I would take him to Mom's
8:6–7 The power of love

8:8–12 Solomon's vineyard
Our sister;
The $1000 are yours, Solomon

9:35 Women in the Song: Subordination or Empowerment?
You have probably encountered many different ideas about what women's roles should be. Which of these ideas are supported by the Song, and which are rejected?
9:50 Break
10:05 Human sexual love as metaphor for divine love
What can we learn from the Song about God's love, or the way we should love God?
Wisdom literature recap
10:20 Lessons for Life taught by Wisdom Literature
· All Truth is God’s Truth ; The Truth is not Our Enemy
· God is not a “God of the Gaps”
· See the Big Picture; Maturity is larger self-identification.
· God ordered nature; the world is good; people are good
· Think about it: God has a Purpose, not a Plan for your life.
· Live this life without thought of reward in the afterlife
10:25 Wisdom and the New Testament
· Jesus’ teachings have similarities to Proverbs and Ecclesiastes
· The NT describes Jesus in terms used by Proverbs (Hebrews, John 1, Colossians 1:17; Acts 17:28)
· Song of Songs is without parallel in the NT
Song or Ecclesiastes Quoted in the NT: Once.
Ecc. 7:20 There is not a righteous man on earth who does what is right and never sins.
Romans 3:10 As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one;
Allusions to Song and Ecclesiastes in the NT
Eccl. "vanity"
Romans 8:20
Ecc. 3:4
Matt. 11:17
Ecc. 5:1
Matt 6:7
James 1:19
Ecc. 5:7
Col. 4:1
Ecc. 5:14
1 T 6:7
Ecc 7:9
James 1:19
Ecc. 8:15
Luke 12:29
Ecc. 9:7
Acts 2:46
Ecc. 9:8
Matt 6:17
Ecc. 11:5
John 3:8
Ecc. 12:14
2 Cor. 5:10
Song 4:15
John 7:38: Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, streams of living water will flow from within him.”
Song 5:2
Rev 3:20: Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with him, and he with me.
10:40 The Worldview of Wisdom in the NT
The foundational theological notion of Wisdom (11)
· The person who will do well in this life is one who recognizes that someone besides himself created the world, and who observes the world around him to learn how it works and how he can live in harmony with the way God made it.
Proverbs shares a lot of theology with the all the rest of the Old Testament:
1. God is good
2. God is Creator
3. Therefore, creation is good
4. Yet creation is in disorder
5. This disorder is the result of human unfaithfulness to God
6. God loves the goodness of what he has made, so he hates anything that ruins that goodness.
7. God’s goodness is irrepressible
8. Therefore, God and Good will ultimately triumph.
This theology is shared by the New Testament, with one extension:
9. Jesus Christ is part of God’s plan to fix the disorder in the world.
a. Jesus Christ represents God’s refusal to abandon his willful creatures to their sin
b. Jesus Christ’s self-sacrificial death atones for human wrong-doing
c. Jesus Christ’s resurrection makes possible eternal life in communion with God as a member of his redeemed people
What difference can biblical wisdom make to life today?
Does wisdom consist of Rules or attitudes?
Does wisdom consist of Promises or habits?
10:45 Final Quiz
11:00 Evaluations

Thursday, March 31, 2005

Week 10 lecture notes

Week 10
Interpretation: Literal or Allegorical?
1. Literal: it is about human love and sexual intimacy
2. Allegorical: it uses the language of human love and intimacy to speak of something else (e.g., the relationship of God and the Church)
· Both interpretations go back to the 200's AD or earlier; the oldest evidence we have is from people objecting to a literal interpretation.
· the Council of Constantinople (550 AD) outlawed the literal reading of the Song.
Is the Song obscene if interpreted literally?
· Many have thought the Song would be obscene if interpreted literally.
· Why should a description of human love and sexuality be a problem?
In teams, read "The Philosopher Ruler" (by Plato) and "Interpretations of the Sublime Song" (by Marvin Pope), then discuss the following questions:
· Which do you think Socrates considered "real": the Ideal or the the realization of that ideal in practice?
· Which did Plato think is superior: abstract ideas or physical substance?
· How did early interpreters of the Song prefer to interpret it: abstractly (spiritually) or physically?
o In Greek thinking, one's physical nature must be overcome by the mind/spirit.
o The church developed in this Greco-Roman culture assuming a world view influenced by Plato, with his idea that mind is superior to matter; that one's physical nature must be overcome by the mind and spirit.
o The church did not question this view of the physical nature, so celibacy was thought to be spiritual.
· But the view of the Bible is that creation is good, and sexuality is one aspect of that goodness (Genesis 1). (for example, resurrection is always resurrection of the body.)
Discussion
In teams, discuss the following question:
What seems to be the intention of the original author: Was it expected to be read Allegorically or Literally?
· Early Jews and Christians alike (from the second century AD on) interpreted it allegorically; they only disagreed about what the allegory represented.
· If allegory was intended, we have no evidence in the Song itself, and so much would be inexplicable. (E.g., the woman (=the people of God) takes the initiative in "rousing" the man (=God).)
· The author did not think erotic love was a problem.
Egyptian love songs
Read Egyptian Love Songs # 3, 9, 31–34.
In teams, discuss the following question:
What similarities and differences do you see between these Egyptian love songs and the biblical Song of Songs?
· The woman is called "sister" (chapter 4; #9)
· They compliment each other: "most" beautiful, perfect (1:8; #31; 5:2)
· They describe anatomy with metaphors (#3; 5:13; #31; 5:11; 7:3–4)
· No dialogue in the Egyptian songs. They are not in each others' presence.
Human Sexuality
· God created the world good, and sexual activity is a part of that good creation (Genesis 1).. Yet it has come to be treated as a commodity, bought & sold, or used to exert power, manipulate, and control.
· Some consider it dirty, others (who treat it as a leisure activity) almost holy. We must not act as if it is the church's job to legitimate the fallen world.
· The gospel is about expressing our humanity, not repressing major parts of it. If one puts faith and humanness in conflict, humans will be unable to handle the conflict and choose humanness. If we think of God as a God of unreasonable prohibitions, we have bought the serpent's lie (Genesis 3:1), not the freedom granted by God (2:16).
· That said, certain types of sexual activity are not good for us. Consider the question in the light of the worldview of wisdom literature, as seen in Proverbs.
The person who will do well in this life is one who recognizes that someone besides himself created the world (3:14; 11:5; 7:14), and who observes the world around him to learn how it works (8:16–17) and how he can live in harmony with the way God made it (8:12–13).
· A wise relationship is one where you know your place and don't pretend you're an exception to the rule. Just as there is appropriate behaviour, there is appropriate sexual activity. Inappropriate activity will only end up hurting yourself. It goes against the way things are.
· Title
Song of Songs = the best song. is about the love of a man and a woman. Implication: sex and all that goes with it are good things, and its ok to talk about them without shame.
The woman resists being considered the property of males. She is not passive and receptive; she initiates.
Outline (10)
A tale of fidelity to love in the face of power and coercion.
1–2: The woman, a member of the king's harem, expresses love for her lover, not for the king. The man reciprocates.
3: The woman is determined to overcome threats to her relationship with the man.
4–5: the threats are again resisted, and the depth of the relationship seems very committed.
6–7: more graphic descriptions of the relationship
8: declaration of woman's passion and resistance to other males who claim possession of her (brothers, the king).
· The woman is a more prominent character than the man; she speaks more and takes more initiative.
· She is devoted to a faithful, monogamous, intimate relationship, and refuses to be a pawn in a male game of legal contracts, money, and objectification.
· She struggles for fidelity to her lover when confronted with the king.
For Next Week:
· Song 6:11–8:14
· Provan 348–378
Your paper.

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

Week 9 lecture notes

Week 9
Quiz
Reading Song of Songs 5–8
As we read the text, what questions arise?
What do you wonder about?
Song of Songs: Date, Authorship: Solomon or later?
"The Song of Songs which is to Solomon": By? For? About?
The author is not Solomon:
1. Solomon never speaks; he is only spoken about.
2. The references to Solomon are mostly negative (more on this later).
3. Solomon's relationships with women are the opposite of what the Song teaches (more on this later).
4. The Hebrew is late, with Persian loanwords, so probably from after the Babylonian exile, like Ecclesiastes.
Interpretation: Literal or Allegorical?
1. Literal: it is about human love and sexual intimacy
2. Allegorical: it uses the language of human love and intimacy to speak of something else (e.g., the relationship of God and the Church)
· Both interpretations go back to the 200's AD or earlier; the oldest evidence we have is from people objecting to a literal interpretation.
· the Council of Constantinople (550 AD) outlawed the literal reading of the Song.
Is the Song obscene if interpreted literally?
· Many have thought the Song would be obscene if interpreted literally.
· Why should a description of human love and sexuality be a problem?
o In Greek thinking, one's physical nature must be overcome by the mind/spirit.
o The church developed in this Greco-Roman culture assuming a world view influenced by Plato, with his idea that mind is superior to matter; that one's physical nature must be overcome by the mind and spirit.
o The church did not question this view of the physical nature, so celibacy was thought to be spiritual.
· But the view of the Bible is that creation is good, and sexuality is one aspect of that goodness (Genesis 1). (for example, resurrection is always resurrection of the body.)
Discussion
In teams, discuss the following question:
What seems to be the intention of the original author: Was is expected to be read Allegorically or Literally?
· Early Jews and Christians alike (from the second century AD on) interpreted it allegorically; they only disagreed about what the allegory represented.
· If allegory was intended, we have no evidence in the Song itself, and so much would be inexplicable. (E.g., the woman (=the people of God) takes the initiative in "rousing" the man (=God).)
· The author did not think erotic love was a problem.
Break
Men in the Song: One or two? Positive or Negative?
· Two main characters, one male and one female. Hebrew, the verb and noun suffixes help distinguish the speakers.
Is the man Solomon and the woman his bride? I doubt it.
1. He is young (black hair; leaping like a young stag).
2. 3:6–11 and 8:10–12 do not present Solomon positively, in contrast to the woman's lover.
Egyptian love songs
Read Egyptian Love Songs # 3, 9, 31–34.
In teams, discuss the following question:
What similarities and differences do you see between these Egyptian love songs and the biblical Song of Songs?
· The woman is called "sister" (chapter 4; #9)
· They compliment each other: "most" beautiful, perfect (1:8; #31; 5:2)
· They describe anatomy with metaphors (#3; 5:13; #31; 5:11; 7:3–4)
· No dialogue in the Egyptian songs. They are not in each others' presence.
Human Sexuality
· God created the world good, and sexual activity is a part of that good creation (Genesis 1).. Yet it has come to be treated as a commodity, bought & sold, or used to exert power, manipulate, and control.
· Some consider it dirty, others (who treat it as a leisure activity) almost holy. We must not act as if it is the church's job to legitimate the fallen world.
· The gospel is about expressing our humanity, not repressing major parts of it. If one puts faith and humanness in conflict, humans will be unable to handle the conflict and choose humanness. If we think of God as a God of unreasonable prohibitions, we have bought the serpent's lie (Genesis 3:1), not the freedom granted by God (2:16).
· That said, certain types of sexual activity are not good for us. Consider the question in the light of the worldview of wisdom literature, as seen in Proverbs.
The person who will do well in this life is one who recognizes that someone besides himself created the world (3:14; 11:5; 7:14), and who observes the world around him to learn how it works (8:16–17) and how he can live in harmony with the way God made it (8:12–13).
· A wise relationship is one where you know your place and don't pretend you're an exception to the rule. Just as there is appropriate behaviour, there is appropriate sexual activity. Inappropriate activity will only end up hurting yourself. It goes against the way things are.
· Title
Song of Songs = the best song. is about the love of a man and a woman. Implication: sex and all that goes with it are good things, and its ok to talk about them without shame.
The woman resists being considered the property of males. She is not passive and receptive; she initiates.
For Next Week:
· Song 3:1–6:10
· Provan 297–347
Not to be handed in; simply recommended for a good paper:
Write an abstract of your paper.

Thursday, March 10, 2005

Week 8 lecture notes

Week 8


Midterm Test


Marriage and faithfulness in Proverbs

  • The teaching on marriage and adultery (chapter 7) is in a section about competing discourses.
  • Choosing one’s life path (choosing wisdom or folly) is compared to choosing one’s life mate.
  • Wisdom is living life in a way that corresponds with to the way things actually are, recognizing one’s place: we are not the creators of our world or of the rules under which it operates.
  • Likewise, a wise relationship is one where you recognize your place and do not try to pretend you are an exception to the rule. Just as there is appropriate behaviour, there is appropriate sexual activity. Inappropriate activity will only end up hurting yourself. It goes against the way things are.
Reading Song of Songs
As we read the text, what questions arise?
What do you wonder about?
Song of Songs: Date, Authorship: Solomon or later?
"The Song of Songs which is to Solomon": By? For? About?
The author is not Solomon:
1. Solomon never speaks; he is only spoken about.
2. The references to Solomon are mostly negative (more on this later).
3. Solomon's relationships with women are the opposite of what the Song teaches (more on this later).
4. The Hebrew is late, with Persian loanwords, so probably from after the Babylonian exile, like Ecclesiastes.
Interpretation: Literal or Allegorical?
1. Literal: it is about human love and sexual intimacy
2. Allegorical: it uses the language of human love and intimacy to speak of something else (e.g., the relationship of God and the Church)
· Both interpretations go back to the 200's AD or earlier; the oldest evidence we have is from people objecting to a literal interpretation.
· the Council of Constantinople (550 AD) outlawed the literal reading of the Song.
Is the Song obscene if interpreted literally?
· Many have thought the Song would be obscene if interpreted literally.
· Why should a description of human love and sexuality be a problem?
o In Greek thinking, one's physical nature must be overcome by the mind/spirit.
o The church developed in this Greco-Roman culture assuming a world view influenced by Plato, with his idea that mind is superior to matter; that one's physical nature must be overcome by the mind and spirit.
o The church did not question this view of the physical nature, so celibacy was thought to be spiritual.
· But the view of the Bible is that creation is good, and sexuality is one aspect of that goodness (Genesis 1). (for example, resurrection is always resurrection of the body.)
What was the intention of the original author?
· Early Jews and Christians alike (from the second century AD on) interpreted it allegorically; they only disagreed about what the allegory represented.
· If allegory was intended, we have no evidence in the Song itself, and so much would be inexplicable. (E.g., the woman (=the people of God) takes the initiative in "rousing" the man (=God).)
· The author did not think erotic love was a problem.
For Next Week:
· Read Song 1–2
· Read Provan 263–296
Not to be handed in; simply recommended for a good paper:
· Review a book or article that is important for your paper.

Friday, March 04, 2005

Week 7 lecture notes unformatted

Week 7
Quiz
Message of Ecclesiastes 7-12
o Don’t think that being perfect is the answer. That’s no guarantee (7:16); rather, fear God: recognize his sovereignty and that He is in control (7:18).
o Don’t think that being perfectly wise is the answer, either: You’ll never be wise enough to figure it all out (7:23–29; 8:16–17). God made us.
o Life is full of things we don’t control: Kings, winds, death, conscription (8:2–9); battles, food, riches, favor, disaster (9:11–12). Time and chance happen to us all.
o Still, do what you can. In general, it helps to be wise, be calm, be kind, be generous, work hard (10–11). Just don’t place your trust in your own self and what you do (11:6).
Ecclesiastes as God’s Word
· What do we mean by “God’s Word”?
· In what way can we think of Ecclesiastes as God’s Word?
· EBC Tenet of Faith #1:
“The Holy Scriptures as originally given by God, divinely inspired, infallible, entirely trustworthy and the only supreme authority in all matters of faith and conduct.”
· Core Values #1:
“Our core values stem from the conviction that God has graciously revealed Himself in time and space, through His Son Jesus Christ and by His Holy Spirit. The inspired Christian Scriptures awaken and attune humankind to the past, present and future work of God. All aspects of our institutional life are to be shaped by and measured against biblical revelation.”
Revelation, Inspiration, Authority, and Canon
By “Revelation” and “Inspiration” do we mean:
· Verbal Inspiration: God dictated Ecclesiastes to someone who wrote about Qohelet (in Hebrew)?
· God placed the ideas into the author's mind, and let him choose the words?
· God’s spirit is in every person committed to following Him, and therefore the author was inspired as they tried to express the things in Ecclesiastes?
· Natural Revelation: God revealed things about Himself in creation, and the author recognized these and expressed them in Ecclesiastes?
· God inspires the text as we read it, if we try to hear His voice in the text?
By “infallible”, “trustworthy”, and “authority” do we mean:
· Ecclesiastes has guarantees from God?
· Ecclesiastes never says anything contradictory?
· We should obey Ecclesiastes’ advice literally?
· The point behind each proverb and poem is true?
· The overall worldview of Ecclesiastes is correct?
· We give Ecclesiastes authority when we guide our lives by something we read in it?
Limitations of the sage
· Proverbs can seem optimistic (3:11–12)
· The reader recognizes that life isn’t so predictable. Job and Ecclesiastes question the predictability directly. (So does Proverbs, in 16:9; 21:30; 30:2–3)
· Ecclesiastes seems to like pointing out ambiguities
· Wisdom sayings, by nature, are not final; they prod one to further thought (Ecclesiastes 12:11).
· Wisdom literature conceals as much as it reveals. A saying can only be a partial truth, and other sayings are needed to complement it. “He who hesitates is lost” / “Look before you leap”
Break
Paper proposal due.
Qohelet and his contradictions: unorthodox, foil or complex?
What does Qohelet say that makes his theology suspect?
1. Life is a miserable evil (4:2), yet we should enjoy life (9:4)
2. Life is vanity, yet it matters how we act (2:13)
3. Life is unfair (2:14), yet God will reward and punish righteously
How can we explain the apparent contradictions?
1. Is Qohelet's teaching presented as an example of incorrect thinking, which was edited later to correct it (e.g., by adding the last chapter)?
· If so, the editor did not do a good job of removing the unorthodox statements or counter-balancing them.
· The last chapter says the same things Qohelet has been saying all along
· The last chapter commends Qohelet; saying only good things about him and his teaching.
2. Is Ecclesiastes written in the form of a dialogue between someone who is right and someone who is wrong?
· We see no indication of dialogue or changes of characters.
· The autobiographical parts in chapters 1 and 2 cannot be dialogues, yet they contain the same apparent contradictions.
3. Is Qohelet talking only about life "without God" when he speaks pessimistically? Is this what "under the sun" means?
· Life "under the sun" does not mean life "without God" (5:18; 9:9, 11), though it may mean this life "on earth" as opposed to what may happen after death (about which Qohelet is vague).
4. Does Qohelet seem to contradict himself because life is not always consistent and there are no pat answers?
· Proverbs does this, in e.g., 26:4–5.
5. Is Qohelet really contradicting himself?
· A few times, technically yes, e.g., whether it's better to be dead or alive.
· But these apparent contradictions must be read in their contexts, in light of the point Qohelet is trying to make.
· A proper understanding of hebel makes a huge difference. He is not saying everything is totally "meaningless;" he is saying everything is not to be "grasped" (i.e., controlled, considered permanent or substantial or even predictable).
Review of Ecclesiastes.
Points to remember:
· Ecclesiastes is not empty, nor is it complete.
· Wisdom has two branches: practical (Proverbs) and speculative (Job, Ecclesiastes).
· Proverbs focuses on the typical, Ecclesiastes on the atypical.
· The Hebrew word translated “evil” does not always carry moral connotations (a natural disaster is an “evil”).
· Qohelet says contradictory things (4:2 vs. 9:4). Why?
o Later editors tried to correct his unorthodoxy? No: they didn’t do a good job.
o Qohelet quoted his opponents’ viewpoints in order to refute them? No: there are no indications of quoting.
o He expresses things that are partially true (like Proverbs does). Yes. This means the danger of taking a verse out of context is especially high!
· Structure
o attempts have been made to find a structure
o none are really convincing
o Better: just follow the flow of the book, with its repetitive cycles.
· Forms:
o “Better than” 7:1–11; 9:16–10:1
o Royal Testament (like Egypt)
o rhetorical questions
· Poetry:
o Most can be divided into poetic, parallel, lines with some rhythm
o However, other characteristics of poetry (lack of particles, terseness) are absent.
· Narrative: For example, “I hated life” (7:17) does not mean life is hateful.
· Addressees: Male (9:9); young (11:9); some wealth.
· Theology:
o God is never called Yahweh; only Elohim.
o not atheist or agnostic
o God is in control
o Life goes better for those who please God
o God is transcendent and incomprehensible but reasonable and trustworthy.
· Relevance: Like today, Ecclesiastes deals with:
o Responding to tradition
o Relationship of individual to community
o faithful living even when God is problematic
o Greed (work as toil rather than calling); the rat-race.
o Human limitations (vs. post-modernism, which promotes create our own reality).
For Next Quiz:
Fee & Stuart 226–230Provan 235–256

Possible Midterm Questions

Question 1

How does the worldview of Ecclesiastes compare with that of Proverbs? To what extent are they in agreement or conflict?

Question 2

What does Ecclesiastes mean by the word translated “vanity”? Summarize some differing views, and indicate how these explanations are helpful or inadequate.

Question 3

Describe the overall message of Ecclesiastes. What points is the author trying to make, and how does he go about making them?

Question 4

What can we know about when Ecclesiastes was written, and by whom? What evidence can we base this on?

Question 5

What are some of the ways people have tried to explain the contradictions in Ecclesiastes? Which explanation do you prefer and why?

Question 6

Was Qohelet's view of life basically optimistic or pessimistic? What kinds of things was he optimistic or pessimistic about?

Thursday, February 17, 2005

Week 6 Lecture notes

Week 6

Quiz

Guidelines: using Ecclesiastes today.

Adjusting Expectations

Mid-term Evaluation.

Exegetical Papers

Retribution.

The worldview of Ecclesiastes: order or chaos?

Quiz

Message of Chapters 4–6

o Good is not automatically and immediately rewarded, and evil not automatically and immediately punished (4:1; 7:15; 8:11). So don’t be surprised at injustice (4:8; 5:13).

o Yet good will be rewarded, and evil punished eventually (3:17), at a time not determined by us (8:12).

o Stop thinking God is someone you can control; don’t be so self-important (5:2).

o Don’t think you are 100% secure, just because you do what’s right (5:13–17).

o Instead, enjoy things when you can, and don’t worry about what you can’t control (5:18–6:6; 8:15; 11:7–12:8).

Exegetical Papers

The purpose of exegesis is to answer the question:

What did the Biblical author mean? What did the author intend his original readers to understand?

Good exegesis consists of two kinds of questions:

a. What he said (content)

b. Why he said it at that point (literary context)

CONTEXT (= WHY) and CONTENT (= WHAT)

1. The questions of CONTEXT are of 2 kinds:

a. HISTORICAL [also of 2 kinds]

i. Historical context in general
= the time/ culture of the author and readers

ii. The Occasion (particular historical context)
= the specific historical setting of a document

b. LITERAR Y [ also of 2 kinds ]

i. Genre
= kind of document, or literary form

ii. Local Context
= The meaning of words in sentences, sentences in paragraphs (strophes, etc.), and paragraphs in larger sections

a(ii) and b(ii) = the why questions

2. The questions of CONTENT (WHAT is said)

a. TEXT

b. LANGUAGE (Words)

c. GRAMMAR/SYNT AX

d. HISTORICAL/CULTURAL CONTEXT
-of an idea, person, event, etc.

Steps for Exegesis of Ecclesiastes

1. Read this section of Ecclesiastes

2. Read the passage repeatedly (in many translations)

3. Make a list of differences among the translations, and any footnotes they may provide.

4. Analyze the structure as far as you can in English

5. Start a list of questions your paper will address.

6. Start comparing commentaries:

a. Check for significant textual issues (is there uncertainty about what the original Hebrew text was?)

b. Note important grammar

7. List the key terms in the passage

a. Do mini-word studies

8. Investigate important historical-cultural items

9. Examine the literary context (arrangement)

10. Check the commentaries again; have you missed anything important?

11. Consider the broader biblical and theological contexts

a. Analyze the relationship to Scripture

b. Analyze the relationship to theology

12. Provide a finished translation

13. Application

a. List the life issues

b. Clarify the nature and area

c. Identify the audience and categories

14. Write the paper

a. Spend time in reflection and prayer

b. Begin with a sense of purpose

i. Main Points

ii. Purpose

iii. Response

c. Decide on the introduction and conclusion

d. Construct an outline

e. Write the paper

Break

Using Ecclesiastes Today

· The text means what it meant.

· The only honest way to interpret something someone said or wrote is to try to determine what the person was trying to say.

· We can’t “proof-text” (take verses out of context to make Ecclesiastes say something it doesn’t mean to).

· What it means to say:

Life is ungraspable. We are not in control of our own future. We can’t guarantee our own success. So don’t place your trust in yourself. God is in control. We can’t manipulate or even totally understand him. He is ungraspable. Yet he is good and awesome. So place your trust in God and respect Him. Enjoy the goodness that comes your way while you can, because you cannot control it. Life is ungraspable.

· You Are Not Starring In Your Own Soap Opera
You do not write the script for your life, nor does the world revolve around you.
You did not create this world, and you did not create the rules and laws it runs by.
Right and Wrong and Good and Bad are not subjective; they are absolute, or at least natural.
God made the world; he is the centre of the universe, the only permanent, reliable, and in-control being in existence.

· See the Big Picture
The key phrase is “in the end”. Ecclesiastes wants us to think of the long-term, rather than just the immediate. That’s why he says mourning is better than partying: keeping your own death in mind puts life in a larger perspective.

· God Ordered Nature; The World is Good
God made creation good, with a certain built-in order, and that is a sign of his faithfulness.

· People are Good
God made people good; but people can ruin things by making destructive choices.

· Ecclesiastes forces the reader to think, to ponder.
By being figurative and ambiguous, and even contradictory, Qohelet forces one to make sense of the world for oneself.

· God has a Purpose, not a Plan for Your Life.
Ecclesiastes implies that God’s will for our lives is a general attitude, not specific decisions.

· Ethics does not depend on Reward or Punishment in the Afterlife
Ecclesiastes does not know of any life after death for reward or punishment. Yet he definitely thinks we should do what is right and not what is wrong.
On the other hand, Ecclesiastes affirms that God does reward good and punish evil.

· Live This Life without Thought of Reward in the Afterlife
Although Ecclesiastes often does remind us of rewards and natural consequences, Ecclesiastes also affirms that if something is right, we should do it, whether we are rewarded or not. Ecclesiastes especially downplays doing things for rewards in the next life.

· Imagine a Videotape of Your Life at the Judgment
On the other hand,
Ecclesiastes affirms that nothing escapes the eye of God. Combine this with Revelation’s story of two kinds of books (20:11–14), in which the Book of Life determines who doesn’t get thrown in the lake of fire, but the other books are still used to judge one’s action, as recorded in the books.

Mid-term Evaluation of Course and Instructor

For after the Break

Choose a topic for an eight-page paper.

You must hand in a one paragraph proposal for your paper next week, stating which option you have chosen (and what passage or word your paper will cover, if applicable).

1. Exegetical paper on a passage from Ecclesiastes or Song of Songs.

2. Word study of a word used in Ecclesiastes.

3. Compare the wisdom literature of the Bible with that of other ANE cultures.

4. Another topic (subject to approval by the instructor).

For the quiz, read:

1. Ecclesiastes 7–12:14

2. Provan 138–233

Week 5 lecture notes

Week 5

Quiz

Word Studies

Keywords of Ecclesiastes: “Hebel”

Ecclesiastes as a response to Proverbs

Ecclesiastes and Proverbs: in agreement or conflict?

Quiz

Word Studies

1) Choosing a word

a) Either: A difficult word

i) Where do English translations disagree?

ii) Where do they have trouble finding the right English word to use?

iii) Where does a translation seem odd (the English word chosen doesn’t seem to fit the context).

b) Or: A significant word

i) What word is an important theme in this book?

2) Finding the Hebrew word

a) Either: Concordance

i) Look up the English word in a concordance.

ii) Either: Find the verse which was difficult to translate, in the list of verses for that word. Which Hebrew word is it translating?

iii) OR: find the Hebrew word most commonly translated by that significant English word (also make note of other Hebrew words translated by that English word: these could be synonyms).

b) OR: Interlinear/Index/Software

i) Look up the verse with the difficult word.

ii) Which Hebrew word is it translating?

3) Finding the instances of the word.

a) Use the concordance or software to find all the other verses using that Hebrew word.

b) Read those verses in their contexts.

4) Looking for patterns

a) What kinds of contexts is this word used in?

b) Is the word used in different senses?

c) Is the word used differently in this book, compared with the rest of the OT?

d) What words it is in parallelism with?

i) Synonymously?

ii) Antithetically? (this will tell you its antonyms)

5) Checking with a Hebrew dictionary

a) Make sure you only do this step after you do your own research

b) See if the dictionary agrees with what you noticed.

c) Remember, the people who wrote the dictionary did exactly the same kind of work you did, to make up their definitions. They aren’t necessarily any more right than you. There’s nothing wrong with improving on their definitions.

Example: Hebel

1) What is meant by the translated “meaningless”, “vanity”, “absurdity”, “emptiness”, “useless”, “pointless”, “senseless”, “breath”, “breeze”, etc. so commonly in Ecclesiastes (1:2, 14, 2:1, etc.)?

2) Identify the Hebrew word

a) Concordance method

i) Look up the English word in a concordance. A good cheap concordance is Young's Analytical Concordance. Strong's is OK, too. These two are based on the King James Version, which uses "vanity" in these passages (1:2, 14; 2:1, etc.). So look up "vanity" in Young's.

ii) Find the verse which was difficult to translate, in the list of verses for that word. Which Hebrew word is it translating? In Ecclesiastes 1:2 and 12:8, two words are used: habel and hebel. In all the other Ecclesiastes references, hebel is used. Strong's number is 1892 for these passages.

3) Find the instances of the word.

a) Concordance method: look up HEBEL in the Hebrew index of Young's concordance.

b) What English words are used for HEBEL? "in vain" 7 times; "vanity" 58 times, "altogether" once, "vain" 4 times.

c) Read those verses in their contexts.

i) Look up the 11 verses translating hebel using the word "vain" (Job 9:29; 21:34; 35:16; Psalms 39:6; Proverbs 31:30; Ecclesiastes 6:12; Isaiah 30:7; 49:4; Jer. 10:3; Lam. 4:17; Zech 10:2)

ii) Look up the 58 verses translating hebel as "vanity" (Deut. 32:21; 1 Kings 16:13, etc., and all the times in Ecclesiastes).

4) Looking for patterns

a) What kinds of contexts is this word used in? Is the word used in different senses?

i) Job: doing something "in vain" = without the desired result; "pointlessly" (they comfort me in vain)

ii) Historical books: "their vanities" provoke the Lord to anger (idolatry?)

iii) Psalms: men and their days are "vanity" = insignificant; a trifling thing; next to nothing (see also them that regard lying vanity)

iv) Proverbs: connected with acquiring wealth

v) Prophets: in contexts about idolatry and error

vi) Ecclesiastes: all is "vanity"; this also is "vanity"

b) Is the word used differently in this book, compared with the rest of the OT? Yes.

c) What words it is in parallelism with?

i) Synonymously?

(1) Vexation of spirit (1:14; 2:11, 17, 26; 4:4, 16; 6:9)

(2) A great evil (2:21), a sore trouble (4:8), an evil disease (6:2)

ii) Antithetically? No.

d) What meaning fits all these contexts best?
I see three main meanings, all related to the concept "ungraspable"

i) "Insubstantial" (a trifling thing, nothingness, pointless) (can't grasp it because there's nothing to it)

ii) "Incomprehensible" (makes no sense) (can't grasp it with our minds)

iii) "Beyond our control" (one's possessions after one dies) (can't hold it in our grasp, to wield it)

5) Checking with a Hebrew dictionary

a) See if the dictionary agrees with what you noticed.

TWOT: Third is the cluster of references found in Eccl (thirty-six). These may be grouped into several subdivisions. First are those passages in which the author states his inability to find fulfillment in work, both in his failure to be creative and in his lack of control over the privilege of free disposition of his possessions; this is “vanity”:2:11, 19, 21, 23; 4:4, 8; 6:2. Second are those verses in which the author struggles with the idea that the connection between sin and judgment, righteousness and final deliverance is not always direct or obvious. This is an anomaly about life and it is “vanity”:2:15; 6:7–9; 8:10–14. The meaning of hebel here would be “senseless.” Thirdly are those verses in which the author laments the shortness of life; this is “vanity”:3:19; 6:12; 11:8, 10. Life, in its quality, is “empty” or “vacuous” (and thus unsubstantial), and in its quantity is “transitory.” (Harris, Archer, and Waltke. Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament. electronic ed. Chicago: Moody Press, 1999, c1980.)

TWOT mentions the three meanings we discovered, in different order, with slightly different words: "lack of control" for "beyond our control", "senseless" for "incomprehensible", and "transitory" for "insubstantial".

Break

Worldview of Qohelet

How much of Proverbs’ worldview does Qohelet share?

The person who will do well in this life is one who recognizes that someone besides himself created the world (3:14; 11:5; 7:14), and who observes the world around him to learn how it works (8:16–17) and how he can live in harmony with the way God made it (8:12–13).

1. God is good

2. God made the world the way it is (3:14; 7:14)

3. Therefore, the world is good (3:11, NIV)

4. Yet creation is in disorder (3:16; 7:29 NIV)

5. This disorder is the result of human unfaithfulness to God (7:29 NIV)

6. God loves the goodness of what he has made, so he hates anything that ruins that goodness.

7. God’s goodness is irrepressible

8. Therefore, God and Good will ultimately triumph. (3:17; 12:14)

Ecclesiastes as a Response to Proverbs

How does Qohelet differ from Proverbs?

· The starting point is the same, but because Proverbs was often misinterpreted to mean that the retribution principle was 100% accurate, Ecclesiastes needed to correct this misperception.

· Proverbs could be taken to mean that if we do what is good, we will automatically get what is good. This is not what Proverbs really says, but people took it that way.

· The overall message of Ecclesiastes is: “We humans are not in control of our own destiny.”

· Ecclesiastes tries to say:

o we cannot control our future (it is ungraspable)

o we cannot even predict our future (it is ungraspable)

o Someone much bigger than us sets up the parameters under which the world and humans operate.

o We need to recognize this fact (we are not the creators of our own worlds), rather than fight it.

· This is why Ecclesiastes keeps saying (in Chapters 1‑3):

o What is the point of all this work? (1:3 It doesn’t change our future.)

o There is nothing new under the sun (1:9 Nothing seems to change, no matter what we do.)

o What is the point of pursuing wisdom? (1:18)

o Yet wisdom is good! (2:13)

o Even if it doesn’t guarantee an improvement in our future (2:14)

o What is the point of pursuing pleasure? (2:1)

o Yet enjoyment is good! (2:24)

o In fact, it is often the gift of God to the one who pleases Him (2:25)

o There is a time for everything, and it is determined not by us but by things outside our control (3:1–8); it is determined by God (3:11)

o Therefore, we should enjoy this good life when we can (3:12), rather than trying to grasp it and force it and control it and create it to our own liking (3:22; 6:10).

o We should recognize the awesome power and goodness of God and what he has done and made (3:14; 7:13)

For Next Week:

Read for the quiz:

1. Ecclesiastes 4–6

2. Provan 102–138